Packing Heat

At a recent paediatrician’s visit, the nurse asked me — as part of a series of standard questions — if we had any guns in our house. Like I always do, I answered with a quick, emphatic “no.” I’m not sure why I lie, because we do, in fact, have a gun. My husband keeps one safely stored in a closet. It’s unloaded and completely inaccessible to our daughters. Yet even though we are responsible gun owners, I guess admitting the truth makes me feel like a bad mother.

I understand the implication behind the question: owning a gun may pose a danger to my child’s health and safety. The American Academy of Pediatrics concludes that although one may feel safer by owning a gun, it’s actually safer to maintain a gun-free home. In their official policy statement regarding firearms, the AAP points to some pretty compelling research against gun ownership. They state, “Guns kept in the home are forty-three times more likely to be used to kill someone known to the family than to be used to kill in self-defense.” I understand this, but nevertheless I’ll still keep a firearm.

I grew up in a house with guns. My father kept a small collection of hunting rifles and shotguns propped up against the wall in his bedroom closet. I could open that closet at anytime and look at those guns. Of course, I would never be as lackadaisical as my dad was back then, but by having them around, I did learn to respect firearms. It was very clear that I was to never touch those guns unattended. And I understood their power. Watching an animal fall to its death from a bullet wound teaches you the power a gun yields far better than any anecdotal lesson about gun safety ever will.

That being said, I’m not a hunter and neither is my husband. We keep a gun, one, because my husband is in the military, and two, for safety. I understand the statistics, and yet, they do not sway me. Instead I trust myself and my husband to determine how to protect our daughters. I trust our ability to safely store that firearm more than I trust the statistic that says there’s only a small chance someone will enter my home and try to harm my family.

In my own community I’ve never heard of any child being accidentally killed by a firearm, yet there have been home break-ins. Several years ago, our community faced a series of house invasions where the homeowners were bound at gunpoint and robbed. And last year near Knoxville, Tennessee, down where my grandmother used to live, a young mother did in fact defend herself against an intruder in her home. Suzanne Carson was alone in her home with her two young children when she heard a noise at her back door. When she went to investigate, she was confronted by a young man trying to break into her home. She retrieved her gun with just one thought: she had to protect her kids. She shot three times and scared off the intruder.

Regardless of all this, I realise my choice may hold some inherent contradictions. As a practicing Christian, my faith informs most of how I live my life and raise my family. I’m pretty sure that Jesus would be anti-gun. He would advocate peace. I get this, and I do struggle with my choice, otherwise I imagine I wouldn’t be lying to that nurse. But I will not love any enemy who forcibly enters my home. If threatened, I would aim that gun and shoot if it meant protecting my children. Under the Second Amendment that is my right, and I believe whole-heartedly in protecting that freedom.

As a parent, I’ll always be a little ambivalent about my pro-gun choice. On a day-to-day basis I see myself as a nurturer. It’s my job to hug and kiss my girls — to make them feel loved and secure. Holding a gun hardly feels maternal. Yet it’s that very maternal instinct that moves me to protect my children at all costs. In a sense, I’m no different than a wild mother bear who will tear anyone or anything apart if she perceives a threat to her cubs. But being human, we are held to a different standard — a moral standard. But that’s the whole rub: if my children were threatened, all moral reasoning goes out the window.

Any kind of risk to my children’s life is scary to me. In the end, though, I realize the kind of risk gun-ownership poses is a risk I can confidently control and minimse. Crime is not. So next time, I’ll be answering that nurse with a “yes.” Owning a gun might be a difficult choice, but it’s nothing to feel guilty about.

Tags:

Comments
  • RICH says:

    At the pediatricians office??? Huh???? That seems like a totally irrelevant question. It’s none of their damn business. I’m still puzzled why they think they even have the right to ask that.That would be my last time in that office.

  • Alan Wong says:

    I don’t see any contradictions between having a gun and being a Christian. You are protecting the children in your care.

    Remember that Jesus chased the money changers and merchants out of the temple. If the person does not belong in your house then “chase” them out. You can fire a warning shot, or shot them in the leg. No need to aim to kill just incapacitate. But if you’re a bad shot then too bad for them huh? *just kidding*

    Also you have a responsibility to protect your children as they have been entrusted in your care by God. You can’t neglect your responsibility just because a pacifist (which is not the same as a Christian) says you can’t have a gun!

  • jack burton says:

    Shelly… you need to go here and read some of these cites. It will make you feel a lot better, and hopefully get you a little angry over the way the gun-banners willfully lie to you.

    http://hubpages.com/hub/Answers-for-those-who-think-that-gun-control-is-the-best-for-America

  • Gordon says:

    Shelly, Jesus would definitely NOT be anti-gun. Just read Luke where he tells his disciples that if they do not own a sword (the military “assault weapon” of the day) to sell their cloak and buy one before traveling. Defending the lives of your children and yours IS an appropriate moral choice.

  • George Szwagulak says:

    Shelley, that Kellerman 43 times more likely study was debunked several times, and once even by Kellerman himself!

    The two most comprehensive studies ever done. CDC (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5214a2.htm) studied 15 of the best gun control studies the World had to offer. “the task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws or combinations of laws reviewed on violent outcomes.” Then not satisfied with the results another study was done, The National Academy of Sciences. (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42167) who issued a 328-page report based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, a survey of 80 different gun-control laws and some of its own independent study. In short, the panel could find no link between restrictions on gun ownership and lower rates of crime, firearms violence or even accidents with guns.

  • Wildfire says:

    Is the doctor qualified to instruct gun safety and do environmental study? Sounds like a “Boundary Violation” that should be reported to the doctor’s mal-practice insurance provider and the State Ethics Board.
    I hand these to such doctors:
    http://www.keepandbeararms.com/downloads/gundocform.pdf

    I suggest “carrying” them when you have any doctor visit.

  • Legion7 says:

    Once again the anti’s have crept into the henhouse. The bible ACTUALLY states “Thou shalt not MURDER”, NOT “thou shalt not KILL” which was a very “Clintonesque” revision of the semantics of the bible by a pretty savvy Pope a few centuries ago. Don’t enable this ignorance by letting the anti’s push their rhetoric. Check a pre king-James version of the bible and see if I’m not right. Don’t believe things just because they are in print. If someone can rewrite text in the bible…

  • Christine says:

    Wow. Thanks for making the world a better place.

  • target says:

    you poor. poor, deluded people. it’s no wonder that you and that child-killing, gone-postal, “collateral” collectin’, gun nut posse that you oxymoronically call the “united states” is going down the gurgler, counter-clockwise, with, as they say, a bullet. would that every gun owner used it on themselves to make the world immediately a dramatically safer place.

 

Post Your Comments

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Comment:

Strollerderby

God Knows We Need A Laugh / Bad Mothers Club

4:32 PM On the fantastic UK Bad Mothers Club website, there's this brilliant bit called Tantrum of the Week. Sick on the bedroom floor and lazy men and working from home are our fav... read more

What’s The Best Punishment For Kids?

2:23 PM Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy What do you do when your kids misbehave? A poll by the self-proclaimed “World’s Strictest... read more

FameCrawler

W Magazine Amputates Demi Moore’s Hip

5:43 PM Okay, we know the gorgeous mother of three likes plastic surgery, but wasn’t it a bit presumptuous of W magazine to liposuction Demi Moore’s thigh without her approval?... read more

Johnny Depp Drunkest Man In NYC (Brilliant Video)

5:00 PM After an evening out with punk legend Patti Smith in New York on Wednesday night, the newly re-crowned Sexiest Man Alive, one J Depp, looked like he was back on the set of Fear and... read more

Droolicious

Star Baby: Nicole Kidman & Keith Urban’s Baby Uggs It Up

5:14 PM I think there is some kind of law in place that Aussies Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban have to put a pair of the Australian born Ugg boots on their daughter, Sunday. It’s... read more

Boy’s Retro Lounge Set

10:00 AM I can’t think of a reason not to love this Boy’s Retro Lounge Set. The bold colours are amazing and the set appears to be extra comfy. The set includes a matching white s... read more
Babble Partners